By Dan M.

On May 5, a 3–3 vote in Clawson’s city council to continue the city’s Automatic License Plate Reader (ALPR) contract with Flock Safety resulted in the cancellation of that contract. Clawson is the third city in Oakland County to cancel its contract with Flock after my hometown, Rochester, and current home, Ferndale. Folks around the country are pushing for their cities to cancel contracts with ALPR companies.

What is Flock? What are ALPRs? What can you do about them? How many puns on Flock and the f-bomb can I make in under 1500 words? Let’s see.

What the Flock are ALPRS?

Automatic License Plate Readers (ALPRs) are computer-controlled cameras that read license plates and send that data — including the image, time, and location — to a storage system for use by the police. These cameras may be mounted to poles, police vehicles, or even handheld devices. The ALPR software analyzes information like license plate number and make/model and compares it to a “hot list” of vehicles associated with certain offenses, allowing officers to more quickly track down targets.

ALPRs have been used for far more than just official police work, however. Officers and others with camera access have used Flock ALPRs to stalk their romantic interests. The Institute for Justice has documented 14 cases that occurred since 2024. In May 2025, authorities in Texas used ALPRs across multiple states to track a woman seeking reproductive healthcare where it is legal. Flock sales employees even used their cameras to surveil a children’s gymnastics room, a playground, a school, a Jewish community center, and a pool as part of a sales pitch.

ALPRs enable authorities to watch people who, even by the logic of the law, don’t need to be watched. It pains me to reference Orwell here, but truly, ALPRs are bringing Big Brother to life. Additionally, data collected by ALPRs is often retained by the companies indefinitely and used to train AI.

Flock is using ALPRs, as well as drones and other technology, to create a mass surveillance network all over the country. Flock makes attractive offers to police departments to install cameras for low or even no cost and has done trials with Border Patrol. Drivers often help to pay for the technology through fees on top of the tickets they pay. Flock also offers “free trial” periods for its technology, as it recently did to Oakland County with drones. Flock is happy to accept as compensation whatever data it can get. Flock is not the only purveyor of ALPRs, either. Axon Enterprise, Inc., the company formerly known as TASER International and as the inventor of its former namesake, is also an ALPR vendor.

Go Flock Yourself, Ferndale

Ferndale city council approved a contract with Flock in March 2023, after it was proposed the previous December. The Ferndale Inclusion Network (FIN), a local activist group that MD-DSA’s Ferndale Area Organizing Committee (FAOC) organizes alongside, has been advocating against ALPRs since the introduction of the initial contract. Members of FIN and FAOC, as well as other citizens of Ferndale and neighboring cities, went to city council meetings for years to speak against Flock. Our work got attention from more and more citizens, who joined in our organizing work. A few of them even joined DSA.

Also during this time, the city held multiple “community engagement” sessions that mostly consisted of Flock representatives and/or police officers giving a presentation in favor of ALPRs, followed by public comment. Despite frequent requests and even promises from the city, these meetings never included a presenter against ALPRs, such as a representative from the ACLU.

At later sessions, these presentations used the March 2025 murder of a DoorDash driver as a case study in favor of ALPRs, saying that Flock cameras were essential for tracking down the suspect. However, their case study mostly used footage from private CCTV cameras, not Flock cameras. Additionally, city officials supporting Flock frequently assured us that data from our ALPRs would never be shared with ICE, other federal agencies, or other police departments, as this would violate our policy with Flock.

During a city council meeting on September 29, 2025, an audit of Ferndale’s Flock data by councilperson Laura Mikulski, who had consistently voted against ALPRs, revealed that federal agencies and police departments from around the country had been allowed to access the city’s data using a National Lookup Search option. Who could possibly have seen this coming? Ferndale then cancelled the contract with Flock. City officials such as the mayor and police chief framed the issue as specific to Flock, saying that Flock was “a bad actor,” but wanted another ALPR vendor.

The city then announced it was seeking a new ALPR contract with Axon. After the community continued to put pressure on city council not to sign, council eventually decided to compromise by making the contract contingent on passing a surveillance ordinance. This ordinance was based on the Detroit Citizen Input Over Government Surveillance (CIOGS) model and was to be voted on by city council. Members of FOAC and FIN and other citizens raised concerns about the proposed 30-day retention period, as well as repeated use of “exigent circumstances” as a justification for the suspension of rules without a clear definition of when these circumstances would apply.

By the time the ordinance came to a vote in February 2026, DSA member Eddie Sabatini had been inaugurated to the city council, meaning a majority now opposed ALPRs. The ordinance failed in a 3–2 vote, resulting in no contract with Axon and making Ferndale an ALPR-free city!

In April 2026, Laura Mikulski posted data from the September 2025 audit on her Facebook page. This audit included who performed these searches, search terms, how many times a search time was used, and more. Less than 1% of searches of Ferndale’s Flock data were made by Ferndale police officers. There were hundreds of searches using terms related to immigration, graffiti, anti-Trump protests, and littering. There was also one search using the term “Hamburger [sic].” This audit is a fantastic case study in how individual city ALPR systems are part of a larger mass surveillance network.

We’re Tired of These Motherflockin’ Cameras in Our Motherflockin’ Cities

What can you do about ALPRs in your city? The FAOC’s anti-ALPR working group is developing a toolkit for organizers. The main reason Flock has so easily been able to slip into cities around the country is that people simply aren’t paying attention. Votes for these contracts are usually public, but if the public isn’t paying attention, they are signed unnoticed.

Attend city council meetings to see if contracts with Flock, Axon, or similar companies are being considered. Speak at these meetings during public comment sections. Bring neighbors and even friends from neighboring cities, as ALPRs affect everyone who ever finds themselves within a particular city’s borders, not just the residents. Here are some arguments against ALPRs and counterarguments against support:

• There exist no formal studies showing that ALPRs are effective at preventing crime. Nada. None. Zip. Zilch. Zero! Any evidence for the effectiveness of ALPRs is anecdotal or from data provided by the companies themselves. Of course companies are going to say their product is effective — that’s their job. It’s our job to point out that their “evidence” is simply marketing.
• If your city council presents a case study in favor of ALPRs, as Ferndale did, pay close attention to the data they use. How much data they present actually comes from ALPRs? As stated earlier, the Ferndale case study mostly used footage from private security cameras, not Flock cameras. Clawson’s case study included the same. Poke holes in their case.
• Companies like Flock and Axon have a long history of shady behavior. For example, Evanston, Illinois, cancelled its contract with Flock after officials found out Flock had violated state law. The story didn’t end there, though. After the cameras were removed, Flock reinstalled the cameras without the city’s permission. Flock doesn’t even play by the rules to which they’ve agreed. In June 2022, nine of 12 members of Axon’s ethics advisory board resigned in response to the company’s plan to develop Taser-equipped drones, stating that they had “lost faith in Axon’s ability to be a responsible partner.” Share examples of these companies’ malfeasance with your city council.

I used to believe the type of pressure we were using on our community leaders didn’t mean much. Having seen the power of it firsthand, I can no longer deny it. The only way we can damage the mass surveillance network being built in our country is to organize a mass of people to oppose it. Find your community and start fighting!

Clusterflock: Automatic License Plate Readers, Mass Surveillance, and What You Can Do was originally published in The Detroit Socialist on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Citizens are outraged at Congress for wielding its power in the abusive manner we have witnessed for decades. The Patriot Act routinely violates the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments and leads us to the breaking point we are subjected to today. Frustrations increased exponentially with ICE invading communities, and citizens distrust the government more than ever.

It is important to remember that your federal representative does not hold all levers of power. Activists are protesting and arguing with city officials around the country, attempting to block ICE from infiltrating their communities. During these battles, it is often forgotten that traditional government positions (such as state and federal representatives, senators, mayors) are not the only officials with power to fight ICE. Positions such as superintendents, park directors, library boards can all exercise some level of their power against ICE. An institution that has taken a step in the right direction is Royal Oak School District. On January 29, the District announced new safety protocols that create a much sterner, strict approach for ICE and Border Patrol (CBP).

Key points within these new safety protocols will protect staff, students, and families in the community. First, any ICE and CBP agent that appears at a school building will be properly identified and redirected to the Board Office, and met by the superintendent, legal counsel, and local law enforcement.

Second, if the agents refuse this and attempt to enter the school anyway, the building will enter lockdown mode, which is the safety protocol enacted when an active threat has entered the building or is on school grounds.

Lastly, if ICE or CBP appear during arrival or departure times, the building will enter lockdown mode and an emergency alert will be sent to all families notifying them of the presence of federal agents. The same team — the superintendent, legal counsel, and local law enforcement — would meet the agents on school grounds.

This protocol was in addition to some guidance in the fall on how to speak with federal agents if needed. This included contacting administrators, protecting identities of all students, and requiring a legal warrant signed by a judge.

This protocol creates reasonable guidelines that should be expected of any school district, but not all districts do so. It is imperative for citizens to ask for their school district’s safety plans for ICE/CBP, and to demand more from the school board and superintendent if they are lacking. Schools are able to provide strict protection of students and have the capabilities to alert families as well.

It is important to note that this policy has not been tested yet — there have not been any federal agents on school grounds in Royal Oak. It is unknown who the Royal Oak police will truly side with if the situation occurs. Police departments across the country have not exactly given citizens reason to trust police to protect them from lawless federal agents.

A superintendent and/or school board using some of their limited power to create safeguards in their community against fascism is a perfect example of power that citizens can direct their attention to. Royal Oak is a community known for leaning liberal — — parents and students were outraged last fall when a Turning Point USA Chapter was created at Royal Oak High School, resulting in student walkouts and protests. Students consistently protesting fascist issues and citizens demanding transparency from the Royal Oak City Commission helps pressure school district officials into creating policies, or shows they will have support for such protections when they create them. Activism is not only about forcing those who are resistant to make positive change, but also about providing support for those who are hesitant to make bold moves.

Local institutions like schools, libraries, and parks can be some very specific zones that citizens can pressure to create protective policies for their community. After all, change often happens from the bottom up. Readers interested in stricter ICE protocol in their local school district should gather a coalition of like-minded parents and citizens to voice their concerns at school board meetings. The same approach can be applied for city commissions, library boards, etc. The more businesses, institutions, and citizens that take stances against ICE, the more likely a city or state is to create a safer protocol.

School Districts Can Oppose ICE was originally published in The Detroit Socialist on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

On May 1, 2026, Metro Detroit DSA rallied at Roosevelt Park as part of the city’s labor coalition for May Day. From the first planning meetings at the IBEW Hall through the day-of march and the debrief that followed, MDDSA (led by members of the Mobilization and Labor Working Groups) sat at the table with Teamsters Local 337, SEIU Michigan, IBEW Local 58, UAW Local 600, UAW Region 1, Moratorium NOW!, Michigan United, and other unions and organizations of the Detroit left. Being in those rooms was the most instructive part of the work.

We were invited in because of the history our members carry in this city’s labor and left movements, and because our chapter has spent the last year building the capacity to show up. A seat at the planning table is not given for free; it is the product of contingent discipline at previous actions and the steady labor of people who have made themselves useful to the broader left. The Mobilization Working Group, formalized at convention, was the structure that let us convert that capacity into coordinated participation and it did so as a genuinely cross-tendency effort, with members from across the chapter’s committees, caucuses, and coalitions working under the MWG’s coordination.

What the Room Looked Like

The most striking thing about the planning process was watching unions sit across from each other under the AFL-CIO umbrella and actually deliberate. These are organizations with different memberships, different cultures, and different relationships to militancy. The fact of them being in the same room, working through speaker order, route logistics, and messaging — that, on its own, was not nothing, and reminiscent of our own practices in DSA.

Still, sitting through those meetings as someone from the organizing side rather than the unionist side, I was struck by how much of the work became institutional rather than political. Speaker order became a question of which body’s position carried what weight, not which voice the day most needed. Logistics bent toward what city authorities would permit and protect rather than toward who the event was for. Parts of the program felt divorced from the meaning of the day itself. May Day belongs to the rank-and-file and in many respects to workers outside unions entirely, and that fact deserved more weight in the room than it fully received.

The People Who Made the Day

What made this May Day special for me was not what happened in the planning room. It was what happened on May 1st itself. We had volunteers from MDDSA across every role the day asked for: tabling, banner bearing, flag bearing, marshaling, medic, day-of flyering, and back-end logistics. New members standing alongside members who have been doing this work for years. People taking on new roles for the first time. People who had never carried a banner or been to a planning meeting walking up on the morning of May 1 ready to be useful.

That is what a chapter looks like when it is functioning. It is also what May Day is supposed to look like. The holiday is not just its program; it is its people. The shape of any given year’s coalition matters less than whether the bodies on the street are organized, prepared, and politically conscious. By that measure, what MDDSA put in the street this year was something we should take seriously, and every member who showed up — for the first time or the fifteenth — should know the chapter saw them.

What Worked

The march itself was phenomenal. Speakers connected the labor question to immigration, to racialized policing, to U.S. imperialism, to the specific intersectional realities of the working class in this city — the working class as it actually exists, not the working class as it appears in a 1950s photograph. That part of the day did the work May Day is supposed to do. It said out loud that the labor movement and the broader struggle against capitalism are not separate fights with separate constituencies.

The fact that the unions came together at all is the bigger story. The goal of this year’s May Day, as I understood it from inside the planning room, was modest and correct: get the relevant Detroit unions into the same physical space, working on the same calendar, talking to each other about something concrete. That goal was met. Relationships do not form in the abstract. They form when people have to figure out together how a rally works.

This rally took place under AFL-CIO sponsorship, something that, by accounts inside the planning room, had not happened in Detroit in a very long time. For most of the twentieth century, mainstream American labor kept its distance from May Day’s radical origins, favoring the September Labor Day that Congress established in 1894 in the wake of the Pullman strike. The AFL-CIO returning to May Day is a real shift, and one that creates room for a fuller program in the years ahead.

What The Numbers Said

Turnout at the rally was an estimated 500 attendees. By my count, roughly half were rank-and-file union members. The rest were politically conscious community members and active organizers, with SEIU showing the most prominent and organized presence. The unions did not turn out their memberships in significant numbers. Michigan’s union membership rate is 13 percent, well above the national rate of 10, and Detroit sits inside one of the more heavily unionized regions in the country. The “No Kings” mobilization earlier this year and last, with broadly anti-authoritarian messaging not specifically tied to labor, pulled thousands into the streets of this same city. May Day, with the city’s organized labor leadership formally behind it, did not. The gap is the question.

Part of the answer is practical. A 4pm Friday start excluded most day shift workers and most service workers whose schedules are not their own, and is worth noting for next year. But timing does not explain the whole gap. If union structures had more time to actively mobilize members for May Day in the weeks leading up to it, a Friday afternoon would have moved more people than it did.

The honest version is the one that came out of the debrief: this was a year of using unused muscles. The apparatus of political mobilization through union locals has been dormant for a generation, and that capacity does not return in a single planning cycle. That is partly an explanation. It is also a question. What would unions themselves have to change for next year’s May Day to actually move their members? Further, where is the current state of class consciousness in the U.S. if unions struggle to connect labor to May Day?

What’s Worth Building On

First, the Detroit left should carry more weight at the table. There is history between labor leadership and the broader left that predates my lifetime, and I will not pretend to fully understand it all yet. But even with that history, the moment demands engagement. Capitalism’s contradictions are visibly tearing at the lives of people in this city, this country, and every country the American empire reaches. A leftist — labor coalition strong enough to meet that crisis needs the organizers, writers, and educators who have spent their lives developing the political analysis the movement needs.

Second, and as has already been agreed to, the planning has to start earlier. Much earlier. The skeleton of next year’s May Day, who is in the coalition, what the political program is, who the speakers are, what the demands are, should be sketched in the fall, not in March. Earlier planning creates space for harder conversations and the programmatic clarity a workers’ rally deserves.

The Debrief

The most important conversation of the entire cycle was the debrief. That sounds counterintuitive, the rally is the visible thing, the debrief is internal, but it is the meeting where the organizers decided what kind of coalition it wanted to become.

The clarity that came out of that conversation was this: the goal of 2026 was first contact, and first contact was achieved. The goal of 2027 is to deepen — to pull in rank-and-file participation at a scale this year’s event did not reach.

Some of that conversation pointed toward the possibility of a general strike in 2028. However, a general strike is not a thing you can just announce; it is a thing that becomes possible after years and years of organizational work most people never see, in sectors of society that have been exploited by capital for decades. Treating 2028 as a horizon can be reasonable, if work of a strategically adaptable and principled nature is achieved prior.

What this May Day did was build one vertebra of a skeleton that does not yet have most of its bones. There is a great deal of work between here and any plausible strike horizon, and the honest version of the optimism coming out of the debrief is that the work is finally beginning to look like work, rather than like a wish.

Beyond the Union Hall

If the labor movement is going to grow into the force this moment demands, DSA, the broader left, and the unions themselves have to take seriously the work that exists beyond the union hall. Detroit no longer looks like the city that defined American industrial labor. Manufacturing accounts for under one in ten jobs across the metro area. Health care, education, retail, food service, logistics, these are where most actually work, and the great majority of those workers carry no union card. The Starbucks Workers United campaign has shown that a young, low-wage, dispersed workforce can build real power against an employer the labor establishment had largely written off as unorganizable. The labor movement that meets this decade is going to be built in workplaces like those, or it is not going to be built at all.

May Day’s politics speak to exactly this work. The holiday does not require a union card. It belongs to anyone who works for a wage, and the power it celebrates is the power of labor itself — the capacity to withhold work, to act in concert, to recognize that the people who do the actual work of running this society can stop running it. May Day started as a revolutionary leftist holiday, built by communists, socialists, and anarchists who understood the workplace was one front of a much larger fight. Keeping that history visible in the present and operative in the future is the work that has to follow. This year, we got into the room. Next year, we have to help change what the room can do — and start building the rooms that do not yet exist.

Forming the Skeleton: May Day 2026 and the Work Ahead was originally published in The Detroit Socialist on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

By Reese McCaskill Jr.

In 1966, during Ronald Reagan’s first term as Governor of California, he made it his mission to rein in public education. He did so because many college students were taking a stand against the war in Vietnam and he couldn’t have that on any UC college campus. In order to curb the anti-war protests, he thought of the idea of initiating tuition (for the first time, while UC schools never had a tuition system). Despite this new system, students courageously stood their ground.

As anti-war protests continued, he even resorted to a more aggressive move; sending national guard troops to suppress the protests at UC Berkeley. Reagan continued to show aggression towards the higher education of California colleges and was stalwart in his defense of his policies. Even his own advisor, Roger A. Freeman was an ardent defender of Reagan’s assault on higher learning. His advisor went on to say, “we are in danger of producing an educated proletariat” which he stated at a press conference, weeks before the California gubernatorial election of 1970. Reagan would go on to win his re-election for Governor and continue his assault on higher learning and the rest is history.

Now, how does Ronald Reagan and his advisor’s statement coincide with the work of the Membership Engagement Committee (MEC)? Because the revolutionary potential of the people is strong. Even in the 1960s, the capitalist class feared that an educated proletariat would recognize their potential and work to radically uplift their material conditions.

Currently, I see the revolutionary potential within Metro Detroit, which is why I am running for our chapter’s Membership Engagement Coordinator position. From the energy of the No Kings Protests to the passion at the May Day rally, Metro Detroit is itching to put the power in the hands of the people. If I am elected as coordinator, there are three strategies I believe would ignite this potential:

1. The creation of an active membership engagement strategy

2. Building stronger bonds between MEC, Committees, and Working Groups

3. Equipping new and current members with tools and knowledge to be effective socialist organizers

In the first 30 days after steering committee elections conclude, MEC would embark on the creation of a membership engagement strategy to accomplish our goal within the MEC resolution to hit 2,000 socialist organizers by the 2027 convention and get 15% of our membership actively engaged in the chapter. As your candidate, I believe our strategy should work not only to recruit new members, but also to orient new members into active organizers in our chapter.

Tangible efforts would focus on stronger social media outreach, recruiting at our campaign events, getting more involved with the community for a long-term approach to engagement, and cooperating with our Administration Secretary to look into our digital tools to consolidate our information so new members understand our chapter. The committee would also look into ways to activate 15% of our membership within this engagement strategy. With an effective engagement strategy, we would ensure every member has the opportunity to develop their political and organizing capabilities.

MEC also needs stronger ties with our committees and working groups. As one of the vital arms of Metro Detroit DSA, this committee is dedicated to engaging with all members. To strengthen our ties with the committees and working groups, MEC would establish MEC Liaisons. These liaisons would be MEC members who consistently attend committee or working group meetings and report back to MEC about the support needed from the committee. With stronger ties to our committees and working groups, this would allow for more rapid engagement of our newer members to their areas of interest and a better understanding of how to engage our entire membership.

Another important task for MEC is complementing the efforts of working groups and committees by preparing, informing, and developing members into stronger socialist organizers. But, how can we engage the membership when they don’t have the necessary tools to develop their political organizing skills? If elected, I would continue MEC’s work of ensuring every new and current member has every opportunity to develop as effective socialist organizers. We would do so by conducting socials, hosting organizer skills events, uplifting our current political education events, yearly convention planning to ensure our membership feels prepared and informed and developing ways the committee can make stronger connections with new members. Every member this committee engages with creates an opportunity to equip and teach. This movement that we are a part of is a great struggle and the only way for our members to understand such struggle is to give them every chance to learn and be ready for the task at hand.

This committee is and must be a reflection of our entire chapter. Independent comrades, Bread & Roses, Groundwork, Marxist Unity Group, Socialist Majority, etc., are crucial for the development and growth of this committee. With the rising tide of fascism, worsening material conditions, and people looking for a way out of this mess, our chapter and MEC must tell the people the good news; socialism is our path forward and Metro Detroit DSA will lead the way.

If I am able to serve as our Membership Engagement Coordinator, MEC wouldn’t be my committee, it would be an all-hands-on-deck-effort to ensure all members feel welcomed and have the chance to be effective socialist organizers. As Coordinator, I would steer the ship of this committee, but the real captains are every member in MEC. Democratic deliberation, discussion, and action would be what leads this committee and I’m proud to ask membership to rank me #1 for the Membership Engagement Coordinator position.

The Revolutionary Potential of Metro Detroit and How the Membership Engagement Committee Can Ignite… was originally published in The Detroit Socialist on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

By Ian Mark

Like many of my comrades, I have a vision of a DSA with millions of working class members that can meaningfully influence politics on the scale of the next presidential election, a potential general strike and more. Only through growing DSA to this scale can we hope to build an organization capable of dismantling capitalism and winning socialism. Our goal is nothing short of building DSA into a genuine mass political party and a historic political force that can transform this country and the world…all in our lifetime.

At present, our chapter has nearly 1,400 members. That’s almost double the number of members we had in 2024. Recent DSA wins like Zohran Mamdani’s election underline that we are living in a time of historic opportunity for socialist politics, but our work is just beginning.

I’m running for Membership Engagement Chair to lead recruitment building the chapter to 2,000 members by the end of 2027 and position us for 3,000 by the end of 2028. I’m also running to support key efforts in driving engagement in our chapter’s projects and democracy, including developing practical organizing skills like how to hold effective one on one conversations and analyze power structures.

I’ve been in DSA for nearly 10 years. I joined Huron Valley DSA in 2017 because I felt compelled to do something other than doomscroll through the mind-numbing cruelty of the first Trump administration. I was angry and scared and I wanted to fight for a better future.

In 2020, I stepped up as the Member Engagement chair for Huron Valley DSA, serving on the steering committee and leading the committee through the surreal first year of the pandemic. In that time, I’ve talked to hundreds of new members and learned a lot about what truly drives engagement.

In this article, I’m outlining my plan for my three priorities of recruitment, engagement and development for the Membership Engagement Committee (MEC). These are the same priorities included in the MEC resolution that the general chapter membership unanimously and democratically voted to approve at our annual convention this April.

Building Metro Detroit DSA to 2,000 Members in Good Standing by 2027, and 3,000 or More by 2028

As exciting as our recent growth is, we can’t take this momentum for granted. Just three years ago, our membership had rapidly shrunk to less than 700 members. Furthermore, most people across Metro Detroit still have never heard of DSA or don’t understand what socialism is. Even many self-described socialists don’t understand why it’s important to join a socialist organization.

If we’re serious about building real power in Metro Detroit, we must ensure sympathetic people across the region are aware that a large chapter exists in their community and invite them to join the movement at scale.

Like most chapters across the country, our recruitment to nearly 1.4k members has been mostly passive, meaning there’s a lot of untapped potential for new members across southeast Michigan. If our chapter had the same proportion of DSA members to population as Twin Cities DSA, we would have over 2.3k members.

If we’re already growing at this rate, imagine how fast we can grow if we apply a concerted effort in recruiting.

I recently launched a new project with several comrades called “database building” (this is often called list building, but I prefer to call it database building to avoid confusion with list work, a totally different organizing tactic).

The database building approach is based on the model provided by New York City DSA, which is by far one of the fastest growing chapters in the country (even before Zohran launched his campaign).

In short, here’s how the plan for database building works:

1. We start by collecting names and contact information for individuals across Metro Detroit sympathetic to DSA and our politics at scale. This is a high-volume play.
2. There are many ways to build a large database of sympathetic non-members, but NYC-DSA cited letter-writing tools and mass calls like the call their chapter hosted with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as highly-efficient tactics for collecting thousands of names.
3. With a growing list of thousands of sympathetic “prospective” members in Metro Detroit, we phone or text-bank this list periodically asking them to join DSA, strategically timing outreach to occur following galvanizing political moments like the ICE surge in Minneapolis for maximum effect.

With this strategy, I am confident we can reach 2,000 members by our annual convention as outlined in our consent resolution for MEC. However, I’d like to go even further so that we can exceed 3,000 in 2028.

To Increase Engagement, We Must Build a More Consistent New Member Onboarding Experience

If we are going to deliver real wins for the working class in Metro Detroit, we don’t just need more members in the chapter. We need more members who are truly engaged, and that starts with new members.

If we use general meeting and convention attendance as a crude yardstick for engagement, only 150–200 members are actively engaged in any given month out of the nearly 1,400 members in good standing.

Our chapter currently excels at engaging new members in two crucial ways: our robust five-part new member political education program and a range of popular socials including game nights, Dances Against Fascism, regional meetups, cookouts, parties at local bars and bowling alleys, and more.

Continuing these programs is vital, and I commend my comrades in MEC for their exceptional efforts here in fostering a true sense of community in the chapter and grounding new members in sound socialist thought.

Where there’s the most room for improvement is ensuring all new members receive an accessible introduction on how the organization is structured, how our democracy works, what campaigns, projects and initiatives we have running and how they can contribute.

The biggest issue I see for engagement is the same issue I saw in Huron Valley DSA: with so many working groups, committees, projects and scattered communication channels, it can be very difficult for new members to understand what’s happening in the chapter and where they fit in. It’s hard to overstate how overwhelming and confusing the new member experience can be without a veteran member to guide you, but in MEC we simply don’t have time to do that for every comrade.

We do an admirable job calling new members weekly in MEC, but due to time constraints we only ever connect with a fraction of incoming members. Besides, in a 10–15 minute call, it’s not possible to share everything a new member needs to know. Lastly, even if we could, it wouldn’t be scalable for the amount of growth we need to build real power.

At the same time, we have to carefully assess what a brand new member truly needs to know, as it’s easy to overwhelm folks by throwing too much information or too many options at them all at once.

I believe MEC must streamline and standardize the new member experience by ensuring new members are consistently and quickly familiarized with the following:

1. The general structure of our chapter, including basic information on:

- General meetings and event schedule on our website

- What committee/working groups exist and what they’re working on

- How to access primary chapter communications (Slack, Signal)

- How our democratic process works, like Robert’s Rules 101 and how to bring resolutions to convention

2. Basic political education

- Basic orientation of what DSA is and does, what socialism is, and why we are socialists

- Schedule for upcoming new member political education events, OR other political education events if above is not in near future

3. Clear tasks to making a meaningful impact in the near future

- Accessible, tangible and specific opportunities to make an impact within the organization and get more involved

One way to achieve this would be consolidating our new member events with a session combining all of the above information in a DSA 101-style event hosted monthly. This would also provide a general entry point for prospective members.

New members would receive a primer on everything they need to understand the basics of our organization and how we operate. They’d get a chance to connect with other members and walk away with information on upcoming political education sessions as well as details on accessible, clear ways to make a meaningful impact, like the No Appetite for Apartheid boycott campaign or canvassing for the Chris Gilmer-Hill campaign.

This would supplement, not replace, our existing new member political education program. It would serve as the go-to first event to direct all new members within Metro Detroit DSA.

Other options include making this information more broadly available in a concise format on our website and in new member email and text outreach. Regardless, the point stands that we must ensure everyone receives the key details on how to navigate DSA in an accessible manner.

Developing Practical Organizing and Leadership Skills to Build Chapter Capacity

Since the majority of new members enter the organization with minimal or zero prior organizing experience, it is vital that we help everyday people grow into effective socialist organizers, thinkers and leaders. This development takes time and doesn’t happen by accident, so we must start this work now with an actionable, structured plan, building on the strong political education program and campaign structure that already exists within the chapter.

I recently launched a list work pilot program for developing leaders with the Chris Gilmer-Hill campaign. In less than two months, this initiative has already identified three members ready to step up as new canvass captains, who are the members that train new canvassers at the event and launch the canvass.

This is a big leap forward from the structure we built to elect Denzel McCampbell to Detroit City Council just last year. Each of these canvass captains gain valuable experience that they can later transfer to other leadership roles in the chapter.

Beyond leadership, MEC must also expand the general organizing skills trainings offered by our chapter. I believe that holding effective organizing conversations should be the number one skill every organizer learns, which is why I co-faciliated a training on the topic this spring. I’d like to run this training again every quarter to ensure every member is familiar and comfortable applying techniques like agitation and making a hard ask. Every single member should feel confident in their ability to galvanize their friends, family members, neighbors and comrades to action with this approach.

Furthermore, I believe we should run trainings on practical skills like facilitating effective meetings and creating agendas, how to use Robert’s Rules, analyzing power structures and more to complement the annual Organizing 101 series from the political education committee. These are skills that you often don’t learn before joining DSA, but are critical to being an effective organizer.

Together, We Can Build Thousands of Skilled Socialist Organizers in Metro Detroit

I have big dreams for MEC and our chapter, but I can’t do any of this work alone. Regardless of the results of the steering committee election, I will be working hard to implement the above agenda, and I’ll need the help of my comrades.

If you’re excited about the possibility of growing our chapter into the thousands and helping ordinary people grow into effective, powerful organizers, please join us. If you have your own ideas for how MEC should operate or what we should prioritize, let me know. Though I’m a proud member of the Groundwork caucus, I’d love for MEC to be a truly multi-tendency committee that serves as a model for how we can support diverse political perspectives and organizing tactics across the chapter.

Solidarity!

To 3,000 Members and Beyond: How MEC Can Build a Stronger, More Effective Metro Detroit DSA was originally published in The Detroit Socialist on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

by Martin Davis

Metro Detroit DSA’s May Day fundraiser to send unionizing workers to the Labor Notes Conference was re-energizing and humbling.

Tables full of comrades at Batch Brewing were bustling with energy after the May Day rally in Roosevelt Park, eager to order pints and sandwiches. I sat down with two of my co-workers and we shared our thoughts on our first May Day celebration. Both of them had no idea that an International Workers Holiday existed, and we were all a bit surprised by how many people turned out.

We heard from two speakers. The first was a co-worker of mine who has been pushed out of work due to injury. She highlighted the predatory practices of our employer that followed her injury. After filing for workers comp, she was followed around by a hired private investigator: a literal instance of adding insult to injury. My co-worker was then pushed to return back to work more quickly than her doctor advised, leading to a worse re-injury months later. I doubt she will be able to stay in our industry.

Each blow she took filled her with motivation to stand up for herself and fight back. She emphasized how normal her experience has been for many more of our co-workers, the need for organization at our workplace as a remedy, and the hope she experiences in striving for a union. Truly, a fighter to the end.

The second speaker was State Representative Dylan Wegela, who spoke on the importance of Labor Notes for actively organizing workers. He and his co-workers from Arizona, where he was a teacher at the time, had attended the Labor Notes Conference in 2018, meeting other teachers who were going on strike in different states. Dylan highlighted that while there was valuable information at Labor Notes, the key force of gathering with other organizing workers was the motivation that he and his coworkers gained.

They decided, on their first night of Labor Notes, to call home and challenge their union leadership to call a wildcat strike. This challenge pushed union leadership to call an official strike vote, passing easily and leading to a one-week strike that won raises and $400 million in extra funding for schools.

Throughout both speeches, the audience was full of energetic response and support. Shouts of “shame!” to the private investigator, applause breaks for the strike wins of Arizona teachers, hoots and hollers for the switch from agitated to organizing. But the support was not just in words but in deeds: the fundraiser took in just under $2000 from the attendees and the many who just bought a ticket to support.

The evening concluded with a performance by Andrea Doria. Waves of good vibes hit the audience of 60+ people, where a long day of showing support turned to a warm atmosphere of joy. I took the opportunity to walk around and greet comrades I had not had the chance to see, sharing cheers and catching up.

I am humbled by all the support shown to me and my coworkers. In saying our goodbyes, we expressed our surprise to be supported by so many people and our hope in what will come of our work. I cannot wait to go to Chicago for my first Labor Notes and, most importantly, to put the movement back in the labor movement.

[Martin Davis lives and works in Metro Detroit.]

May Day Money for the Movement was originally published in The Detroit Socialist on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

By: W.J.

I found my way to a Metro Detroit DSA meeting through my work with one of the ballot initiatives the chapter endorsed last year. Another volunteer and I were there to give our pitch and try to recruit MDDSA members as petition gatherers. What struck me when I opened the door to Ant Hall was how packed it was — all the seats were full. It was standing room only. I’m a bigger guy, so I had to “ope” and “pardon me” my way from the front door to a tight corner off to the side, navigating around to the counter space where we’d set up our computer to record new volunteers and set out our clipboards and petitions.

As we got ourselves ready before the start of the general meeting, we were approached by one of the many leaders of the chapter, Jess Newman. Jess came to check in with us, made sure we had everything we needed, and gave us a rundown of how the meeting would go and when we’d be beckoned forward to make our pitch.

We were all set. Jess told us that we’d be called up front near the end of the meeting, before members would be released for the post-meeting social. With nothing to do for a bit, I decided to putz around Ant Hall and check out the meeting, not quite sure what to expect. I walked in right after the emcee got done asking new members to stand and ask what got them interested in DSA. The answers I heard were about what I’d expected: Some “recovering” Democrats, others who were unaffiliated with the two parties had just had enough and wanted to be productive, and a few who weren’t quite sure but wanted to come see what the Democratic Socialists of America were all about. Regardless of the passion or certainty in their responses, all received fervent applause and smiles from their new comrades.

I went back to the main hall after a few minutes and noticed that they’d started a panel to discuss the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Their discussion sat with me for a good long while. I’d paid some attention to what was going on over there, passively looking at the news and reading the occasional article that made it into my feed. Listening to the panelists describe the history of the occupation and the atrocities committed after the October 7th attack left me angry. Angry at my country for enabling it and angry with myself for being powerless to do anything about it.

Then the conversation changed. They talked about various humanitarian organizations on the ground, and how we, an assembly sitting in Hamtramck, could support them. There was some relief at the mention of direct action we could take, but a mix of anger and dread remained.There was a look of quiet defiance on the faces of the membership that I noticed during this panel, and I realized that I was in a space filled with people that weren’t just going to sit quietly and listen about atrocities happening and go on about their day afterwards. With that realization came some reassurance and a lingering curiosity: what would I do next?

The meeting continued. As it neared the end, Jess returned to the front with a few others to talk about the on-going petition drives within Michigan For The Many. I think the meeting had gone over time, because she proceeded to give a quick overview of each one herself instead of calling up reps to go over them (which I didn’t mind at all). What did catch me off guard was Jess calling the group’s attention to me as not only an organizer for my group, but also a future DSA member, which received a small applause. I was feeling a bit mischievous, so I smiled and said, “We’ll see.” I actually already had the membership page up on my phone and was just going back and forth on the pledge amount for a sustaining member. Afterwards, I joined my partner at the counter and signed up about a dozen comrades to carry our petition. It was not a bad day at all.

After the meeting, we packed up, and I was hungry. At Jess’s recommendation, we went to Yemen Cafe down the street, where I ate entirely too much. While I was waiting for my check, I unlocked my phone, set my pledge amount, and skimmed the page welcoming me to DSA.

So why did I join? It was being in community with others. Sharing a space that made me believe that a better world is possible, and knowing there’s over a thousand Metro Detroiters organizing to make it so.

Why I Joined DSA: To be on the Right Side of History was originally published in The Detroit Socialist on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

By Jane Slaughter

Meeting members of UAW Member Action, the reform group within the UAW, makes me remember why we’re doing this socialism thing. On a recent weekend their steering committee met in Southwest Detroit. People came from Kansas, Kentucky, Illinois, Indiana, New York state, as well as around Michigan — and not all of the 40 or so members were even on the steering committee. They just wanted to be part of the action.

UAW Member Action was founded a year ago, after the previous reform group, UAWD, dissolved over internal differences over what a reform caucus should be. It was sad, because UAWD had done great work to help get Shawn Fain’s slate elected to the union’s executive board in 2022–23.

But leaders regrouped and founded UMA with the mission of educating members and training new leaders. Despite Fain’s big win at the top in 2023, almost all UAW locals are still run by the same crowd of management-friendly types who came up in the union’s bureaucracy before. They make it harder to fight the companies and their way of operating encourages members’ cynicism about the union and the possibility of change. UMA is digging in for the long fight for change throughout the union.

FROM THE SHOP FLOOR

When I went to their Friday night social, I wasn’t thinking of an article. I didn’t ask if I could use anyone’s names, so I won’t. I met a retired case worker for the state of Michigan, a member of UAW Local 6000; we talked about the problem that a Local 6000 member with a similar job had just brought to DSA’s labor working group (threats of violence from clients).

I met a Ford worker from Kentucky who said he works with DSAers all the time, including on a May Day festival coming up, co-sponsored by DSA, his local, and the AFL-CIO.

I sat by a Ford worker from Chicago who told how she and her co-workers leafleted all shifts, all four entrances, in their fights with management. I talked with another Ford worker who’s running for state senate in Indiana.

I met a Detroit Stellantis semi driver with just four years’ seniority who’s running for UAW Convention delegate. I congratulated a Jeep worker who just got elected delegate, on his third election try. He’s a leader of an informal group there who ran against the “good old boys” who head the local.

At one point UMA Chair Scott Houldieson said to the crowd, ““If we’re not building our union to fight the boss, what are we building our union for?”

It was encouraging that when I introduced myself, “Jane Slaughter, I’m with Labor Notes,” everyone knew and liked Labor Notes. Some mentioned our book, Secrets of a Successful Organizer. Some are going to the national Labor Notes Conference June 12–14 in Chicago. (The DSA labor working group held a fundraiser on May Day to send Detroit-area lower-wage workers who are unionizing.) It’s all part of the “troublemaking wing” of the labor movement.

In DSA, we can disagree about a lot of things. I think we’re pretty united on working with these types of worker-leaders who really exemplify the future of socialism in this country. We’re not going to get there without them. We need DSA to be their allies and eventually their own.

[Jane Slaughter is on the board of Labor Notes, where she covered the UAW for decades. She works on Detroit DSA’s newspaper committee.]

Rank-and-File Reform Alive and Well in the UAW was originally published in The Detroit Socialist on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

By Lila B.

At this year’s annual convention, over 200 members of Metro Detroit DSA took the time to deliberate, debate, and vote on a variety of key chapter decisions.

As a big tent organization, our convention is one of the most valuable opportunities for members of varying tendencies to come together and decide collectively how we move forward as a chapter for the next year.

Through consensus resolutions, we agreed: to prioritize educating the millions of working class people open to democratic socialism about the core tenets of our movement, to build our chapter to 2,000 members by our 2027 annual convention, to re-affirm the Socialist in Office committee’s valuable work in coordinating with our elected officials, to establish a new Mobilization Working Group, and more.

We also strengthened our administrative functions by dividing the secretary role into separate administrative and communications roles. This creates more manageable, sustainable workloads for tasks that support the entirety of the chapter without putting an undue burden on any one member.

As a proud member of the Groundwork caucus, I wanted to share a few key takeaways from convention for the broader membership to consider.

We agreed to address structural issues in the chapter with the Unity in Action commission

One of the most exciting votes was the decision to approve the Unity in Action resolution.

The debate and deliberation around this specific proposal ended up taking far more time than for any other resolution at this year’s convention. That’s because we, as a chapter, took the time to make compromises in real-time, incorporating feedback from a member on the floor to remove some language from the resolution. I found it to be a commendable example of comrades working together across tendencies to build consensus.

This cross-tendency collaboration resulted in an amended resolution that the majority of members felt confident enough to vote YES on.

The passage of the Unity in Action resolution underlines that as an organization, we agree that there are indeed a variety of serious infrastructural challenges facing our rapidly growing chapter necessitating further inquiry, deliberation and proposals. By adopting the Unity in Action Commission, we collectively agreed to create a democratically-elected commission dedicated to shoring up the infrastructure that we desperately need to keep scaling the fight to win socialism in our lifetime. Ultimately it will take all of us, across tendency and caucus, to build MD-DSA into the mass socialist party that can speak to the millions of working people now open to our politics.

It’s critical to note that if we’re serious about addressing these structural issues, we will need buy-in, input and compromise from every ideological tendency in the chapter. Moving forward, it’s important that we take this mandate from convention seriously and continue working across our differences to build up every corner of our organization.

We agreed that our chapter must strengthen a broad array of work including labor, political education, electoralism and more

Walking out of convention, it was also clear to me that the majority of our chapter agrees that every part of our work is of vital importance, from labor and political education to electoralism and ecosocialism — which is why we all feel so strongly about how these groups should be structured.

The debate surrounding the political education resolutions in particular underlined the broad desire of our membership to see a strong political education program in our chapter. We all want new and long-time members alike to feel confident thinking through robust critical analyses of both our current political moment and the history that brought us here.

Where Groundwork differs in opinion from other caucuses and the Democracy Coalition is that we believe strongly in building a party capable of recruiting and engaging the masses. Our vision for the chapter is one that meets people where they are, that makes every corner of our organization as accessible as possible, and that unequivocally believes in every new members’ ability to be active and engaged from the first day they join the organization.

Whether it’s voting on chapter and committee decisions or joining the work, we believe that simply by virtue of being in DSA, every member is more than capable of engaging in our chapter regardless of when they joined, what meetings they’ve attended or what theory they’ve read.

We look to each and every member and say: we trust you with the work and we trust you to have a say in our democracy. That’s why I’m ultimately excited to get to work and support everything the convention passed on 4/11.

We agreed that steering committee should be empowered to make administrative decisions and that real democracy means having the option to re-elect leaders

I was also happy to see that the resolutions focused on taking decision making power away from our elected leadership and depriving our organization of institutional knowledge by imposing term limits were both voted down.

Our members affirmed at convention that they want to leave the administrative work to the folks tasked with doing it so that we may focus on doing the important work of winning socialism in Detroit.

Likewise, members recognized that real democracy means having more options, not less, in any given leadership election. Members were savvy to the fact that we don’t need term limits because nobody gets on the steering committee (or stays there) without our consent.

Members want a Metro Detroit DSA for the masses

The UIA commission and the campaign proposals on the consent agenda are all meaningful steps forward toward building a mass movement and a party for Metro Detroit DSA. Next year, I hope to see even more proposals around campaigns that bring as many working class people across Metro Detroit into the fold.

Our internal work is important, but it’s clear that despite our differences, a vision of centering ambitious, external-facing campaigns is resonating with members across a variety of tendencies. Members across the organization are here to build a chapter for the masses, not the few. To create a chapter for not just the already converted, but for a true mass movement to win socialism in Metro Detroit.

Everybody in, nobody out!

MD-DSA 4th Annual Convention Shows a Strong, Ideologically Diverse Chapter Organizing Together for… was originally published in The Detroit Socialist on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

A big advantage that the right and forces of reaction have compared to us on the left is that they are defending a system that already exists. There’s not much for them to disagree over, at least not ideologically. We on the socialist left, on the other hand, are trying to build an entirely different kind of society. There are many different ideas of what socialism means and what a socialist society will look like. Ideally, DSA would be united with a clear vision of the socialist society we want to create and firm tactical and strategic plans to get there. We are not at that level of development yet. How do we get there?

I was impressed with the conduct of the chapter at convention. Considering the endless Slack arguments in the weeks leading up to it, I and other comrades I talked to were anticipating an extremely contentious Saturday. Even though there were raised voices at times, all of the arguments were political. I didn’t hear anyone’s character impugned or socialist bona fides questioned. It was even more impressive considering how few times I’ve seen real substantive debates, the kind that draw out the political fault lines within the chapter, happen in my time in DSA (just one time since I joined last June, when there was an amendment on the resolution to endorse the Michigan for the Many campaign).

The lack of debate at General Meetings might have appeared to newer members to show that there was a great deal of ideological unity in the chapter, and the disappearance of that illusion might have come with some shock. If you follow the goings-on at the national conventions, you know that there are a very wide array of tendencies, represented by an even wider array of caucuses. We got a short, though probably not exhaustive, list of the caucuses represented in the chapter at convention after a point-of-information from a comrade. To the newer member, it may seem like they’ve joined an organization of organizations rather than an organization of organizers.

Perhaps even more alarming to them, was the clear divide between Groundwork and the Democracy Coalition. If you were to look at both of their respective voting guides again (don’t worry, I looked so you don’t have to), neither side won everything they wanted. If one side had, I suppose that would be a type of unity, though it would be a shame if the winner would assume they had total control of the direction of the chapter, disregarding the margins they actually won. In the “big tent” of the DSA, the “big tent” meaning that DSA contains any and all tendencies of the anti-capitalist left, there isn’t going to be ideological unity.

The most unified way to move forward is to deliberate and decide our course democratically, so that all sides can make their case to the body they’re in front of, so that both the winning and losing sides will respect the decision that’s made. The way we get to a more unified chapter is through having these types of deliberative assemblies more often.

I think a big reason for the tensions on Slack leading up to the convention is the lack of a public forum for these various views to be heard. Importantly: these need to be in-person forums. It’s much easier to be short with someone or misinterpret tone when things are being hashed out online rather than in person, and having an audience adds additional social pressure to make sure everyone is on their best behavior. While I agree with comrade Ian A.M. that one-on-ones are great and necessary for our organization and rebuilding a sense of camaraderie between the different factions, the best way to build unity is to continue these debates on the floor of the new General Meeting.

It’s my hope now, as it was when I was writing the amendment to R8 to create the new General Meeting structure, that the half hour of time dedicated to debate in the new General Meeting format will be a place where we can regularly exercise our deliberative muscles and collectively develop politically while we try to steer MDDSA. All the amendments, motions and counter-motions that can occur on the debate floor under Robert’s Rules may seem onerous, and there was a point during the afternoon session of the convention where I was feeling ready to get the whole thing over with, but continued practice will help to smooth out our processes.

These debates aren’t just rhetorical exercises, though. The point is to collectively decide on a plan of action, implement it out in the real world, and then evaluate its efficacy. Then the process starts over; we deliberate over a new course of action, vote on it, implement it, and evaluate it. This is how we achieve unity, by respect for democratic decision-making.

Coming out of convention, I actually see a lot of unity in our chapter. We’re unified behind two new campaigns: No Appetite for Apartheid and Organizing Amazon. We have a new Mobilization Working Group. All three of these will carry our work out into the world after spending a bit too much time concerned with internal organization.

Democracy may look like chaos, but it’s actually the source of our strength. Democracy and organizing create our unity, not bylaws amendments or an omerta on discussing factional differences. I look forward to continuing our deliberations and organizing in the next year with all my comrades.

Chris W. is a law student and an uncaucused member of the Democracy Coalition.

How to Live in a Big Tent was originally published in The Detroit Socialist on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.